1719-1797


You will find download buttons for the scans and transcripts, or you can view them online by clicking the links where it says “View in new tab…”.

It was not a happy new year for Mr. Maxwell Junior, blacksmith at Portsmouth Dockyard who has evidently been slow in performing his duties. So much so that The Board write on 2nd January 1719 demanding he find two people to support him with security of £500. Note that The Board members sign themselves ‘your loving friends’.

View in new tab:


January 5th, 1719, Bell Jones writes to ask Captain Pattison to assess shot and shells, that were condemned and seized, to ensure that they are suitable for use. This is the first letter addressed not only to Mr. Hooper but also Captain John Baxter. Possibly the workload was building, or Captain Baxter was in training under Mr. Hooper.

View in new tab:


A note on 17th January 1719 contains a request, and a receipt for sheet lead and cisterns for work on the new barracks and the gun wharf. This is followed on the 20th by a similar request.

View in new tab:


Whoever wrote the precis for this note clearly misread Mr. Bowerbank’s name as ‘Bowerband’.

View in new tab:


This note lists gunners’ stores returned from HMS Boyne. This was the vessel preceding the ship of the same name that famously exploded at Spithead in 1795.

View in new tab:



A receipt for ballast baskets from Mr. John How on 27th January 1719.

View in new tab:


Mr. Baxter has evidently written to The Board regarding the state of the powder in the stores, because on 6th 1719 February he receives news that there is to be a ‘proof of powder’. This was to validate its suitability for use to the service. Proofing was performed on all Ordnance and proof marks would be stamped on the barrel. Powder was also tested to prove its suitability for its intended purpose. Powder barrels would be marked to indicate the type of powder they contained.

View in new tab:


On 20th February 1719 a note lists small arms delivered from the armoury and the Grand Storehouse. Among those from the storehouse are Musketoons, these were short muskets.

View in new tab:


On 6th March 1719 Mr Stanyford is presented with a contract to build a carriage shed and a cistern. A really tidy looking document, but somewhat challenging to read in places. One word in particular presents a problem. In the precis we see possibly: Terrah, Terral or Terras followed by cistern. In the text body, near the end of the first paragraph, the word appears again but only ‘Tar’ is properly intelligible. Later, as a title to the third paragraph, we see Tarras, again followed by Cistern. ‘Terral’ means ‘ground’. In the text we read that the cistern is to be under ground, so, it looks as though we are talking of a terral cistern.

View in new tab:


The note from the master of the Content hoy, John Edmonds on 29th December 1718/9 states that he will be transporting a number of standing carriages (land carriages as opposed to ship carriages) to William Dixon, the storekeeper at Plymouth. The dates can be confusing: March 1718/9 means March 1719, and the date at the bottom of the note (Xber 29th 1719) means December 29th 1719.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


Two letters regarding accommodation follow, the first agrees to Peter Coward taking up residence in a house built for him on the Gun Wharf and the second regarding rooms for clerks.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


I think it is fair to assume that Boatswain Richard Dailey could not sign his own name as we can see that he left his ‘mark’.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


A letter of 13th April 1719 gives us an example of how different people denoted the pound sterling. In the precis it refers to an imprest of 200lb using the symbol usually used for a pound in weight, whereas in the text of the letter the £ sign is used. The letter advises Mr. Hooper that the £200 has been paid to John Baxter and that he is to repay £87/18/6 to John Hooper.

View in new tab:


On 13th April we see another letter of complaint about the method of bookkeeping employed at Portsmouth Dockyard. It seems that apart from confusing ‘day labour’ work with contracts in the ledger, day labourers are being employed to redress defects in work done by contractors.

View in new tab:


The Board ask, on 16th April 1719, for an account of tampeons, heads, rammers and formers as they ‘rot in store’. One wonders why, if stored properly, they should rot in store.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


Again, on the 24th of April 1719, another letter of complaint from The Tower at the instigation of William Harrison, addressed solely to Mr. Baxter, demanding duplicates of Mr. Hooper’s accounts from 1717 which he is unable to find. He also reiterates the need for accounts to be made in ‘the new method’ and insists on the December accounts to be re-submitted. He finishes by asking for no further ‘frivolous excuses’.

One has to wonder why, if looking for Mr. Hooper’s accounts, the letter is addressed solely to Captain Baxter.

View in new tab:


The final letter of 24th April refers to ‘standing carriages’. These were carriages for guns used on land, not ships’ carriages.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


On 11th May 1719, Edward Fitchett, master of the Isaac & Elizabeth hoy makes an appearance with a bill of laden. He introduces us to Mr. George Collett, storekeeper at Chatham and some of the items being transported are particularly interesting. We start with old iron for Woolwich and ‘Doulidges’, which were the iron plates that strengthen the wooden trucks (wheels) of gun carriages. There is ‘Bushell Iron’ which was miscellaneous scrap iron. The word ‘poiz’ also appears here, read this as ‘weight equalling’.

For Chatham there are crows of iron, which we would know as crowbars, ladles, which were used for disarming a gun, budge barrels, which were small powder barrels with no lid and a rope handle. These little barrels would have been used to transport match powder from the magazine to the gun deck. Portacks were the tackle used for raising and lowering the gun ports.

View in new tab:


Confirmation of the approved chain of command is again underlined in a letter from Jonathan Dawson of the Ordnance Board on 16th May 1719 where he reminds the storekeepers that an admiral may not order them to restock a ship without the instruction of The Board.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:



On June the 4th 1719 there is another chapter in the ‘discussion’ between Portsmouth and The Tower regarding ledgers. Rowland Gibson writes from Woolwich, it would appear that he has supplied an example of how Mr. Harrison wants to see the accounts made out. Clearly there has been some discussion between Woolwich and Portsmouth on the subject and Mr. Gibson is trying to help his colleagues.

View in new tab:


We saw earlier (9th January 1717) that stores were being removed from Burrough Fort in Gosport. On 10th June 1719 we now see that sheets of lead recovered from there are being redistributed.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


22nd June 1719, Rowland Gibson writes again offering help to Captain Baxter in meeting William Harrison’s requirements, and on 26th William Harrison himself writes asking for more accounts.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


On 30th June 1719 we learn a new word: ‘frobusher’. A frobusher was a metal polisher. This letter speaks of tools made by Henry Pouncy to the value of £9/4/4 3/4.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


Clearly persistent, Mr. Harrison writes from The Tower on 8th July 1719 demanding that Messrs Hooper and Baxter submit their accounts for the previous two quarters. He does seem rather put out. On the face of it, it looks as though Messrs Hooper and Baxter have been lax, however, we saw no letters of complaint until William Harrison arrived on the scene. Such a shame that we cannot see the replies to Mr. Harrison’s letters.

It may be indicative of the thoughts of the clerk in that he simply precis the letter “Mr. Harrison” with no comment on it’s content.

View in new tab:


Two letters from Captain Bell Jones on the 9th and 13th July 1719 advising that they have instructed the dock office to transfer 30 tons of junk to the Office of the Ordnance. Junk was old rope ends and left overs from rope making it was used as wadding when loading the guns.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


A bill of laden from William Batt, master of the Pomroy hoy arrives on 14th July 1719 in a beautiful hand well laid out and containing uncommon contractions: he uses the elaborate capital ‘P’ for ‘per’ or ‘by’ and ‘men‾cond’ for ‘mentioned. This note also gives us sight of the size of guns he is carrying: 8 pounders 7 ½ and 8 ½ feet long and sakers of 6, 6 ½ and 7 ½ feet long including the weight thereof. In addition, he is carrying almost five tons of ‘bushel’ iron (scrap). We see this receipted on 16th July.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


17th July 1719, a bill of laden from William Batt, master of the Pomroy, who is to deliver 8 pounders, sakers and 4 tuns, 12 cwt, 1 quarter of iron. The receipt is endorsed by John Hooper.

View in new tab:


This document is missing any form of introduction. It lists scrap, unusable iron taken from old gun carriages.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


On 28th July 1719 Bell Jones wrote to John Baxter advising that he was issued an imprest of £200 to be used as a contingency fund and that he should pay travel costs to Peter Coward, clerk.

View in new tab:


Johnathan Dawson writes on behalf of Bell Jones on 3rd August 1719 with a somewhat amusing message. Referring to a recent request to supply 3400 paper cartridges, he writes “…you better pack up 600 more to complete the number to 4000.”

View in new tab:


A letter from William Dixon on 6th August 1719 is missing its address, so we must assume that it is to Mr Baxter or Mr Hooper. It starts by discussing guns and carriages, but concludes with a personal note sending the best wishes of his family, and with a post script aimed at Captain Pattison regarding a book and sending best wishes to other friends.

View in new tab:


On 8th August 1719 Rowland Gibson’s letter to Captain Baxter retains its seal depicting Charles 1st raising the question “Why?” as Charles 1st was beheaded in 1649. The letter itself appears to be another episode in the ongoing saga of Mr. Harrison of the Office of the Ordnance, and the accounts submitted by Captain Baxter.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


17th August 1719 William Batt, master of the Pomroy hoy lists the guns he has received to take to Woolwich. The following day more guns are received on the Isaac & Elizabeth commanded by William Fitchett.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


Mr. William Harrison adds another chapter to the story of Captain Baxter’s accounting work. On 28th August 1719 he is again complaining that he has not received accounts, yet at the same time says that he has received a copy from Mr. Bisco.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


On 31st August 1719 an account of ‘laboratory stores’, these were fuses, cartridge cases &c. The Laboratory was where the cartridges, grenades and other ammunition was made up.

View in new tab:


A number of receipts, dated 1st September 1719, all written by the same clerk, but signed by various army officers.  for powder, flints, pikes, shot and introducing us to the ‘chevaux de frise’ a spiked, wooden obstacle designed to impede infantry and cavalry. These receipts were all pinned together.

I have only included one of these as they are all very similar.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


Another document, transcribed by Philip Eley, this time a personal letter from Richard Veal (a Richard Veal, likely to be the same person, was one of the storekeepers in the mid 1700s). Unfortunately the document was not placed correctly in the scanner and some lines have been clipped. Philip has made a best guess where there are missing letters which he has indicated with square brackets.

View in new tab


On 17th November 1719 a letter from Rob Bennet tells a story of fog and storms impeding the shipping between Greenwich and Portsmouth. It also tells of the poor health of the Surveyor General, Sir Michael Richards.

View in new tab:


A bill of laden, dated 3rd December 1719, for the Isaac & Elizabeth hoy lists iron carriage parts being transported from Woolwich to Plymouth. The hoy made a stop at Portsmouth and the parts were transported onward to Plymouth as is borne out by the accompanying letter dated the following day.

View in new tab:


On 7th December 1719 a bill of laden for the Isaac & Elizabeth hoy lists stores to be transported to Messrs Hooper and Baxter at Portsmouth, Bedding for Peter Coward, clothing for Captain Pattison, and carriages and oil for William Dixon at Plymouth. The oil is supplied in a 2 tun fault. This was a large container holding 9 bushels.

View in new tab:


18th December 1719 an account of old iron &c gives us an insight into the iron parts of a gun carriage. Parts such as cap squares, that held the trunnions in place and doulidges, the metal plates that held the wooden parts of a truck (wheel) together.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


A letter from The Tower from W. Harrison, Junior is the beginning of an ongoing issue between him and the Portsmouth Office of the Ordnance. This letter of 15th January 1719 is insisting that receipts from all persons should be in duplicate with a copy being sent to The Tower. Is it a coincidence that this issue arises at the same time as Captain Baxter arrives on the scene? Could it be that he and W. Harrison Junior, also new on the scene, are already acquainted?

Until now all letters between The Tower and Mr. Hooper have been friendly and business like; something has changed.

View in new tab:


A long letter on 2nd January 1720 dictates the method of dealing with old gun carriages to make best use of any useable parts. It appears designed to reduce wastage as the smiths avoid using second hand iron unless it suits their purpose.

View in new tab:


An indenture on 20th January 1720 hides an important clue to the symbol used to indicate a hundredweight.  Faded, and just above the section titled ‘Tarred Rope’ we see ‘5 hundred weight’, so the circle with a cross through it must indicate ‘100’.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


On 7th March 1720 Joseph Burton enquires about some laboratory stores which were delivered by the Speedwell hoy.

View in new tab:


A letter of 16th March 1720 discusses firefighting equipment including fire engines, which were in their infancy at the time. The letter also goes on the discuss the tricks used by gunners when declaring their remaining stores.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


An interesting letter on 19th March 1720 discusses the standardisation of the build of gun carriages in order that parts may be interchangeable. A move toward mass production.

View in new tab:




On 24th August 1758 a list of stores to be transported by land carriage to Portsmouth intended for Fort Loius on the river Senegal in Africa.

View in new tab:


7th February 1765 a letter enquires what ordnance stores were supplied to a hired tender, Eagle, between march 1759 and January 1762. One wonders if such a request could be answered today given that records are rarely kept today for more than 2 years.

View in new tab:


On 22nd October 1766 John Boddington writes to Richard Veale regarding an imprest of £200 and advising that minor requests need not be passed by The Board. Temptingly ¼ of the original seal survives on this letter.

View in new tab:


12 years later in January of 1778 Thomas Butler writes on behalf of The Board to set out the method of manufacture and storing of gun carriage parts. The letter even goes into the detail of ensuring that the timber is well ventilated and carefully stored with regard for preventing decay. Again, parts of the original seal remain.

View in new tab:


In July of 1779 John Boddington writes, in a most beautiful hand, ordering 5 rounds of case shot to be issued to all ships of Sir Charles Hardy’s squadron immediately.

View in new tab:

A private letter of May 1780 to Mrs. Veale (presumably the wife of Richard Veale, storekeeper) from her Aunt, Susan Price discussing the health of the family and financial matters.


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


13th July 1790 a badly faded imprest for £500 between Messrs Rich Foreman and William Bache for bricks. William Bache was the first storekeeper at the new ammunition store at Priddys Hard in Gosport. The calculation on the second page is rather confusing.

View in new tab:


A note on 16th August 1790, asks for an accompanying letter to be passed to Mr. Eade who supplied birch brooms. It is marked as coming from the Office of Ordnance ‘Westmr’. There was no office recorded at Westminster, so one wonders the reason for this.

View in new tab:


On 22nd September of 1790 Admiral Howe’s fleet arrived at Spithead, the Dockyard being ordered to supply them with gunners’ stores. The letters by now are rarely addressed to individual officers, but to ‘Respective Officers’.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


On 21st February 1791 a letter from Rich Foreman talks about an imprest for £200. The letter is addressed to Richard Veale, yet at the bottom he is referred to as Dr Veale. Does this mean that our storekeeper was a doctor?

View in new tab:


Another very faded letter to Mr Veal on 5th September 1793 tantalizingly talks of an enclosure from Mr. Courtney, asking if it is satisfactory, however, the enclosure is missing.

This is the last letter addressed to an individual storekeeper; subsequently all letters are addressed to ‘Gentlemen’. Incidentally: we note that Richard Veale is here referred to as ‘Esquire’, a title applied to those above gentleman, yet below knight.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


On 4th June 1794 twenty wagons of ‘musket cartridge weapons’ are delivered to Portsmouth by ‘several persons employed in the neighbourhood of Chichester’ at a cost of £800.

View in new tab:


In the Patrick O’Brien novel, ‘HMS Surprise’, Jack Aubrey describes cannonades thus: “What a lynx you are, upon my honour: nothing escapes you. And clearly you know a canon, a great gun? Well now, conceive of an unlucky bastard cross between the two, something that weighs a mere twenty-eight hundredweight and jumps in the air and breaks it’s breeching every time you offer to fire it, and that will not strike true at five hundred yards, no not at fifty, and there you have your cannonade.”

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


November 1795 a letter to Mr. Veale asks for 30 of his people to work overnight aboard the Ordnance Ship Isabella to shift her stores as the ship is wanted for service without delay.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


Another letter on 10th November discusses HMS L’Clair’s guns. The commander, Captain Douglas, is asking that one of his guns be fitted on a sea service carriage allowing it to fired abeam, on the quarter or astern.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


The 12th of November 1795 was a busy day:

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


The storekeepers, having replied to the letter of the 10th regarding carronades for Amethyst, saying that they were more than the stores had in stock, but suggesting to The Board that they reassign returned guns in lieu. They are given the go ahead.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


On 14th November 1795 a letter from The Board directs the storekeepers to inspect the ordnance and other stores delivered by two vessels: Active and Bourdeaux Trader. It is difficult to find information on either vessel as Active, a Liverpool privateer, launched in 1789, was reported as having foundered in 1794. However, the vessel is listed as both a brig of 100 tons and a sloop of 165 tons. A brig would have been a post captain’s command, whereas a sloop would have been commanded by a lieutenant, known as ‘master and commander’. Perhaps these were two separate vessels? Bourdeaux trader was reported wrecked in 1787, and re-floated.

View in new tab:


Again, on the 14th November 1795 The Board wrote to advise that the stores required to supply ships for duty will be sent ‘by the most speedy conveyance’.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


Two more letters that day instruct the stores to resupply vessels for Channel Service.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab:


A letter of 21st November 1795 stating that the storeship Expedition is returning to The River from Portsmouth commanded by Lt. Rop. The storekeeper is ordered to fill her with unserviceable stores to be used as ballast.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


The Royal Navy commissioned Mr. Nock, gunsmith of London, to supply volley guns intended to be used from the fighting top of a ship to pick off the officers on an enemy’s quarterdeck. These guns had seven barrels which fired .45 pistol shot, all barrels fired at the same time, so the recoil was considerable, which was their downfall as it required sizable men to fire them. These guns were made famous in the television series ‘Sharpe’.

View in new tab:


In September 1796 we see a note from the militia demanding powder, flints, paper and thread. There is no endorsement, but pencilled annotations infer that the stores were, in part, supplied.

View in new tab:


View in new tab:


View in new tab: